Topic Closed|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
|
Grand Master |
sound forge or CE2 for effects..which is BETTER?
"tell me - I must know" haha- D** R***** never rote me back, the scrote |
||
|
Celebrity![]() |
that depends
My W*ves DirectX plugIns don't work in SoundForge, so I've started using CoolEdit more. Also, in coolEdit, you can apply non-detructive effects to your tracks (in the multi-track view), and then tweak them to your liking as you listen to your mix. |
|||
|
|
Visionary |
I sometimes use SF for delay. some of the reverb/delays are less 'lush'/warm and overtly affected than CE's...also,I liked the compression in SF better, seemed to leave the track less processed sounding, ei less 'pumping' sounding..generaLLY, I dont use it tho.
cant really get too far along yet with graphic EQ work - I am kinda all over the map there tried to use the tremelo effect in SF, and it was pretty neat for something that I'd never think to use, but...hey I have been trying to work a JL mp3 into a .wav CE session, and so evrything is kinda closed down and compressed cause of the mp3.. |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
hey that new Coke C2 is great , less calories
|
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed
